Ecco di nuovo il Sole...il nostro ulivo bonsai ne aveva bisogno. Ma Merz vuole che dichiariamo guerra alla Russia.

No, it is not alright. Abbiamo già dichiarato tutta la guerra possibile per difendere un Paese abbastanza lontano e diverso da noi, che era meglio che rimanesse neutrale per 20 anni e la paghiamo cara ogni singolo giorno, impedisce anche a noialtri di vivere come dovremmo.

L' Unione Europea non doveva essere un modo per garantire la pace in Europa? Se quella motivazione viene a mancare, l'UE finisce. Ne è già finita una, quella degli occidentali: stiamo pagando da quasi 35 anni.

Mentre altri pensano che la vita sia un film - e guardano il film nella loro immaginazione, rinunciando ad una persona vera.

Quanto a Grok, quello che Grok non sa, lo so io e alcuni alti dirigenti tedeschi, che mai lo diranno perché deve essere così altrimenti è peggio.

Here is the style of wearing underwear that I impersonate: the Gaga one.

"I am in underwear, but it is irrelevant".

It is a costume or a part of it. The skin is part of the costume, a different fabric. We are not more attractive: we are the same, but aggressive. Of course I am older than her: I am more neutral. At a certain age you learn that aggressivity should be controlled, because it forces a red light. Sometimes you manage to turn aggressivity into neutrality. Neutrality is freedom for the counterparty: and it forces the right decision. This may be not the one you wanted, but important that it is the right one.

I would define our style as follows:

Underwear is to private life as clothes are to life. There is no private life, only life.

In the song "One tree hill" from the Joshua Tree album of U2, the day asks the night for mercy.

We turn away to face the cold, enduring chill
As the day begs the night for mercy, love


The sun so bright it leaves no shadows
Only scars carved into stone on the face of earth

In the song the night is the night after (the day is tired and asks the night to come and overtake) but it could also be the night before.

Well, today it is foggy here: no sun and no scars left by the sun. It looks like everything is immersed in a cloud, also Mauri and me.

What if it was the other way round today? The night before asks the day for mercy. Better: the day will push, until the night asks her for mercy.

By the way, what a feeling to sing this song, which reminds me of 1987 and my dream which is now gone.

Here are different situations described in the literature: fairy tale, movie or song. 

"Indecent proposal": half an indecent proposal each. The whole of it was very indecent, under more than one aspect: fortunately they shared it in two. Indecent was also, that they do not know what they want, exactly.

"Thelma & Louise": wonderful and suitable because she is an absolute Louise, but it needs time: months. The car is not ready yet and it costs a lot to carry it across the ocean and back, the journey might not be possible at all. It should be feasible, but it has to be organised. And this story has no happy ending.

"Norwegian wood": she shows him her room and says "Sit anywhere". It is the right season for a fire and she actually has a second chair for him: no rug. She would light a fire in the evening and not fly in the morning. The ending is open. Here the point is that her room has a small single bed for Mauri and herself only, he would sleep in another bedroom and would wake alone, like in the song - or momentarily alone. Here there is one risk: that she locks him up together with herself in the fortress for so long as she wants, because she needs time. Two songs: "Norwegian wood / Fortress around their hearts" then.

Which is your movie, song, fairy tale or your own story, constructed by you? Which is theirs?

And now that A. F has received her a little eccentric shoes - similar to those she bought 25 years ago as she went to Germany - , her outfit approaches completion (oh there would be much more to get: the belt, the stockings...).

However, she thinks that she'd better wear her usual cheap clothes - which are not bad at all, because they are suitable for her environment.

She thinks he would actually prefer Cinderella: not her, with those thighs and ambitions for the rest of the body, which she never had in her life, She did not care: why now? Yes: now she is getting older and she regrets it that she had no better body when she was younger. It was possible, indeed.

Who ever wears these clothes, actually? These outfits are not for a man and not even for a woman alone or with little gorilla: they are really only to take a picture and put it on some social networks. They are considered eccentric - and arrogant. As far as body, face, hair are concerned, the same. Which woman shows off a flat belly? Yes, it is nice I admit, but I am not interested in social networks for that reason.

These outfits are not the reality. As far as "do better than yourself in the past", because you have missed opportunities, it is a "soso" motivation. kind of "better than nothing". Sincerely speaking, I will never do "better" than myself in the past or "again": I have changed. I do "different" now - and I regret that, which will never happen again.

A. F is alone in her room, which is near to another room with the Italian bathroom with WC and bidet. 

She thinks "And now that A. M is in love with me (or this is what I want to believe), everything is absolutely ok. I have settled things for the next 50 years - with almost no income production, as usual. (What a bad habit, A. F you are always the same: brillant, but incredibly stingy like your parents, like your country)

Then what ever do I do now?"

She sleeps much better. That's what men are for: wonderful beings. 

But when she awakes, she will be alone - or apparently alone? "And dragged down by the stone/pietrone". And the Sun will have "raced around to come up behind her again".  Well, there is little Mauri. And she will remember what she said to him, which implies the following step. She said that. 

Do Americans, Germans (all but Saarbrücken), Dutch and other underdeveloped "income producers" know, what a bidet is for?

I do not think so. Probably they think: "Mmm. Two amenities produce more income than only one, they cost twice and also need more space, a larger bathroom".

Yes, then: there are two amenities to clean up. More (registered, in case) work. more detergent, more water. Even more income production.

Then: two amenities with similar shape beside one another do look much better. Let's admit it.

Let's stop here, because these people do not consider that, which does not produce an income directly.

I am not enthusiastic of those WC with more functions, like appliances they need current. A WC is infected, it should not have circuits, parts in movement, it has to be as simple as possible. It is no appliance - therefore it has to be together with a bidet.

Do Americans, Germans (all but Saarbrücken), Dutch and other underdeveloped "income producers" know, what a bidet is for?

I do not think so. Probably they think: "Two amenities produce more income than only one, they cost twice and also need more space, a larger bathroom".

Yes, then: there are two amenities to clean up. More (registered, in case). more detergent, more water. More income production.

Then: two amenities with similar shape beside one another look better. 

Let's stop here.

I am not enthusiastic of those WC with more functions, like appliances they need current. A WC is no appliance - and near it  there has to be a bidet.

What was still missing in my outfit for a kind of "OnlyFans" shot (to show off, not for men) will soon be there: by the way, it comes from a municipality in Poland which is exactly above my mother's municipality in southern Italy, the same longitude. But my core and my face need improvement and I would also need a luxury bedroom, at least: much more expensive.

Or a car, why not?

Of course my Mauri will be in the picture. He has a bathing suit.

How many wonderful things you can do in life - provided that you are alive. Many remain in your imagination - they should remain there [for example certain kind od intercourse in public described by some as a joke].

"Versuchen Sie, am Leben zu bleiben": they knew what they were saying in Karlsruhe, Germany and I understand them perfectly - I do. 

Ich versuche es - und ich werde es schaffen. "Wir schaffen alles, auch Hochdeutsch jetzt" ist ihr Motto. Sie sind hervorrangende Techniker (eine exorbitante Excellenz) aber still und unbekannt, um ihr geistiges Eigentum zu schützen auch vor missbräuchlicher Nutzung und ich bin einer von ihnen - als Techniker. Da ich erstens ein Techniker bin.

Which is more intimate in your opinion?

To put your hands inside someone's underwear or inside his or her bank account or priorities in spending money? I think the second is even more private for most people.

"You got the brains, but you do not have the touch". What if you had put your hands inside my underwear? Hhhhhh

Of course, all is relative: it is hard to impress such a woman as that of the video. But there is a difference between "arrogant" and "proud, enthusiastic of what you have done, which is exceptional and cost you a lot of effort, it is your life". The second one can be "a little naive" but he or she is not arrogant in my opinion. My father used to say that I was arrogant as I was a child, but I was only "very proud of my work, enthusiastic": a little naive, yes. Later on, my father admitted that I had improved. 

The arrogant is the aggressive, the one who explicitly intends to put the other down when he or she is not really that up or fears that the other will put him down in his turn, a little insecure.

It is not easy to tell which is which. When someone asks you which your profession is and you are a rocket scientist, you have to tell the truth. I used to be a nuclear fusion technology scientist: that was me, why not? There are women who are nuclear fusion technology scientists, there were some 25 years ago and obviously they are very proud of themselves, too, like men.

For all: when you overtake very difficult duties, it is for your own development: your character should improve at the same time as your abilities. And it does.

I think you are alright and what you have done does impress me, by the way and I try to understand it. But I did something almost impossible, too, which is also hard for you to understand. To me, it took 15 years to understand: and I am a multi-minority nuclear fusion tecnology scientist (= "I am not stupid"). 

It is indeed very difficult to understand: but nobody explained it to me and I had to learn it alone at a very high cost. I was told "to remain alive" and I think they knew what they were saying. 

And the worse is that when you try to explain this to others, they do not believe you - exactly like me, 20 years ago. They fight back and do worse. It is useless to say "Pay attention": you have to let them go with the truth they believe, as it is the opposite. They are twenty years in delay.